Final Essay Questions

Social program line surmisal suggests that offensive , its intimidation and preponderance , is a product of the dish of social cultivation and interactions . thusly , incarnate crime is a consequence of the work conditions and purlieu of employees (Simpson , 2002 . Employees atomic number 18 motivated from committing crime to stay as belong out of their orientation into the organization or to protect champion s line of descent , advancement and social standing in the company . adjudges of corporate crime locoweed then be developed at once , by establishment of penal measures much(prenominal) as demotion , prisonbreak or dismissal indirectly by offering incentives for life history advancement for those who admit with regulations internally by emphasizing the communal effect of visitation to comply with regulat ions and through needs joy methods or providing benefits such as retirement or commitment programsEnvironmental criminology suggests a inter-group communication amidst the incidence of crime and spatial settings . This means that there are certain environments that become predispose to crime or to a particular crime or that an individual s cognitive deportments are influenced by this environment . These spatial areas are characterized by not only living conditions still also by a lifestyle that creates greater pic to victimization (Bartol Bartol , 2006 . These areas develop because of the pic of victims , lack of mechanisms for monitoring or detection and the possibility of momentous rewards from crimeAmong the sociological theories regarding criminal style , learning theory terminate provided significant insights to the current trends in homicides and assaults in the United States . In contrast to maneuver theory , there is indication that punitive measures and conditi oning is not influencing these crime trends ! as indicated by the establishemtn of no clear relationship between the severity of control mechanisms and the preponderance of homicides and assault (Weisner et al , 2003 .

though this is not to day that control theories can not be productive in the get hold of of criminal behavior , by using learning theories , the disposition of these crimes can be examine to determine what causes the characteristics or behaviors associated with onslaught (Jensen , 2007 . Furthermore , by perusal the social learning process that leads to these crimes , factors that influence the level of control that individuals can develop can used to determine interference programsReferencesBartol , Curt R Anne M . Bartol (2006 . Current Perspectives in rhetorical Psychology And Criminal arbiter . London : Sage PublicationsJensen , Gary F (2007 . Social Learning and furious Behavior . The Cambridge Handbook of Violent Behavior . David Flannery , Alexander Vazonsyi , and Irwin Waldman (Editors . Cambridge : Cambridge University PressSimpson , cranny S (2002 . Corporate execration . Law , and Social Control Cambridge : Cambridge University PressWeisner , M , Capaldi , D . M Paterson , G ( 2003 . Development of ant-social behavior and crime across the life-span from a social interactionist perspective : The compulsion model . In R . L . Akers G . F Jensen (Eds . Social Learning and the report of Crime : New Directions for a New Century . pp . 317-337Title page 2...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay